Unusual Roulette Systems Explained: The Masse Egale

Posted by Harry Kane on Monday, February 13, 2017

While the plethora of online casino platforms are home to a huge diversity of roulette iterations, there are almost as many strategy variations available to players. Although this offers considerable opportunity to players, however, it also creates challenges in terms of selecting the right games and the most suitable betting systems for your philosophy. Knowledge is the most important thing in this respect, as this leads to informed and ultimately successful decisions.

If you fail to build your levels of knowledge and understanding, you run the considerable risk of prioritising one of the more popular roulette betting strategies regardless of whether or not it is suitable for you. Instead, it is far better to compare the entire range of available roulette gambling systems, including those that are unheralded, untested and in some instances criminally underrated.

The Masse Egale System Explored: A Simple Strategy for spread betting

Let’s take the Masse egale system, for example, which is not only a relatively unknown strategy but also one of the most simplistic. It is based on a principle that is entirely opposed to traditional and popular systems, which drive progressive wagers across both winning and losing streaks. This can take the form of both positive and negative progression, with the former known to minimise losses and the latter focused on significant gains.

In more simple terms, the Masse egale betting system is the polar opposite to the Martingale and the vast majority of modern iterations. In fact, there is absolutely no progression at all with this roulette system. This means that throughout the duration of an entire game or gaming session, every single move or coup is executed using the exact game wager. This repetitive system neither strives to optimise gains or minimise losses, meaning that bettors can gradually aim to build their bankroll while also accessing a greater flexibility of bets. While progressive betting systems can only really deliver success across outside, even-money bets (think odd, even, red and black, for example), the Masse egale strategy enables players to utilise inside wagers. After all, the lack of progression creates an opportunity for players to adopt a riskier approach to the individual bets that they place, as they spread their bankroll across single numbers, street wagers (which includes three numbers across a single horizontal line) and a split bet across two numbers. While you can extend this strategy across outside bets too, the fact that these boast a pay-out of just 1/1 and minimal reward means that you should restrict these wherever possible.

The Disadvantages of the Masse egale Betting system

While spreading your bankroll across two or three inside bets optimises your chances of success when using the Masse egale system, your probability of winning regularly with such odds is low. This is a core disadvantages of the system, while it also explains why so many increase their betting spread to include even-money outside wagers (lowering the house edge and securing more regular successes in the process). The issue with this, of course, is that you must then make a sacrifice in terms of how much you are able to win, which in turn can lead to barely profitable games and sessions. There are other issues with the system too. Firstly, its simplistic nature may cause experienced players to lose focus, as applying the same wager continually can become repetitive and trigger a lack of focus. The lack of progression, while favourable to some, also fails to deliver satisfaction during the course of winning and losing streaks, as you cannot capitalise on the former while the latter continues to gradually drain your bankroll.

The Last Word: Is the Masse egale right for you?

Ultimately, the biggest appeal of Masse egale is arguably its greatest detractor. Although the lack of progression (either positive or negative) may catch the attention of inexperienced players or novices who are looking to hone their skills, it also creates an imbalanced system that fails to offer any genuine reward or stop-loss feature. Remember, progressive wagering enables you to either optimise your winnings or minimise losses, appealing to alternative playing philosophies and the entirely random nature of roulette outcomes. While it is worth studying and understanding Masse Egale, it is probably only appealing to a small and select playing demographic. Although you are unlikely to lose huge sums of money and the statistics suggest that wins and losses tend to even out over a concerted period of gameplay, it is debatable whether or not experienced or strong-minded players would see any benefit in this simple strategy. After all, the system does little to impact on the European roulette house edge of 2.7%, while the use of inside bets also diminishes the probability of regular success accordingly. Given that you need regular wins to achieve any sort of success with this system, the Masse egale is probably a strategy that you should avoid as a serious player.